Death of a Journalist:
A Rhetorical Analysis of a Visual Argument
Journalism is one of the most underrated, yet essential professions in our society. Journalists are responsible for providing the basic understanding of the operations of local, national and global occurrences. It is intended to objectively inform the public on issues and topics that are both relevant and important to their everyday lives. The press serves as a watchdog for the government and its officials and keeps them in line when making and implementing policies. It is also the only profession clearly protected in the United States Constitution under the First Amendment. It is from this description that my image was created and publicized.
My image consists of a news story posted on what appears to be a news oriented website with the headline, “Katy Perry Unfollows Russell Brand on Twitter,” accompanied by a picture of the two celebrities embracing each other. The headline leads into more text along the right side of the picture going into greater detail of the relationship’s tragic demise. The altered text in the image by the rhetor displays “R.I.P. Journalism” at the top and “1456-2012” at the bottom, acknowledging the death of journalism.
When trying to fully analyze a piece of rhetoric such as this one, it is important to identify certain factors that combine to create an effective and persuasive message. These factors include the rhetor, exigence, audience and constraints of a visual argument. By being able to comprehend all of these constituents, we are prepared as viewers to formulate an informed response to the argument.
In journalism school, one is taught that credibility is vital for writing believable and trustworthy articles. This also applies to the rhetor of a visual argument. If the communicator is superficial or careless in his or her efforts to properly check facts and connect with an audience, the piece of rhetoric being written or shown will become obsolete. This image first spawned at the website, weknowmemes.com, but the individual producer of the image is not credited. The website in which this image appeared is generally known for supplying sarcastic and humorous material that can rarely be taken literally. Although the website’s reputation would hardly make it a credible source, the underlying reasoning for some of its postings, such as this one, evokes a subtle yet identifiable problem that the reader can simply recognize.
According to Laura Bolin Carroll’s essay “Backpacks vs. Briefcases,” it is crucial to understand a message’s exigence “because it helps you begin to discover the purpose of the rhetoric. It helps you understand what the discourse is trying to accomplish.” (49) For this image, the exigence is telling us that journalism is losing focus on newsworthy information and the very purpose of its formation. It suggests that tabloids and celebrity gossip are tainting the news feed of our pop culture and overshadowing more important social, political and economic issues. We live in a society that is so influenced by celebrities that we lose sight of real problems and topics. We care more about the personal lives of public figures than issues that seriously affect our everyday lives. This image is just one example of how news has turned more into a source of entertainment rather than what it was originally intended to do.
Audience is very important when constructing a piece of rhetoric. Rhetors must know whom they are talking to in order to build a bond or connection with them through their message. The intended audience for this image is those that understand the value of traditional news and reporting. It is the people who do not get caught up the gossip of public figures and can separate what is relevant from what is nonsense. This audience tends to be more educated as citizens and news seekers.
The last factor to consider when looking at a visual argument is the constraints that affect it. Carroll illustrates that “constraints limit the way the discourse is delivered or communicated.” (49) By knowing the constraints, rhetors can alter messages to fit within the confines of legal and intellectual hindrances. A constraint with this image, and with the media in general, is the concept of what constitutes news? There are so many different definitions of what is deemed “newsworthy” that, to some people, this information about Russell Brand and Katy Perry could be considered worth media attention. However this photo challenges the belief that celebrity action, especially in this miniscule act of unfollowing someone on Twitter, could be dubbed “newsworthy.” It is also constrained by the rhetoric of its genre, being a meme. Meme are typically seen as comical and not tenants of social change. The audience may overlook the problem addressed in the meme due to its facetious connotation.
Another set of rules to apply to a visual argument in dissecting the meaning is the Greek artistic appeals: logos, ethos and pathos. These appeals allow the audience to gain insight into the argument being proposed and allow the arguer to construct a persuasive message adequately. These along with the constituents of rhetorical analysis help us to better design and evaluate visual arguments.
Logos appeals to the readers’ logical and intellectual side; Carroll explains it as an “argument from reason.” (52) This image appeals to our logic by sarcastically alluding to the contrast of traditional news and tabloid gossip. As the audience, we are able to decipher the dissonance illustrated in the picture by the added text declaring the death of journalism. This hints that because of celebrity news, journalism has become a business of gossip rather than the messenger to the public. Logically we are able to see the outrageousness highlighted in this picture.
As stated earlier, credibility is crucial on the part of the rhetor in attempting to persuade an audience. Credibility in this case is synonymous with the Greek appeal of ethos. Not knowing the creator of this piece pulls into question the image’s ethos. The author of the image could have been a journalist, news critic or everyday person. This uncertainty affects the audience’s cognition of the piece. However, the image is simply publicizing an issue in journalism that does not require the credibility of a specific political platform for example. The awareness conveyed through this image is profound enough still without the identity of the creator being known.
Carroll explains the final appeal of pathos as, “emotionally manipulative or overly sentimental, but are very powerful when used in conjunction with the other two appeals.” (53) This image can evoke several emotions from its viewers. It is humorous, thus grabbing the audience’s attention easily. It may also evoke outrage over the thought of journalism being a celebrity-focused profession. There could be feelings of disappointment or sadness from the viewer for seeing this once revered and trusted part of society turn into a source of extraneous gossip.
Overall this image effectively gets its message across to the audience. It demonstrates that journalism has lost its focus on true news and has turned to entertainment over information. Although disappointing, the piece may also be intended as a call to action on the part of aspiring journalists. By building awareness of this problem, traditional journalists may step in to fix this issue of excessive coverage of celebrity personal lives and return the attention to important issues that affect our society.
Works Cited
R.I.P. Journalism Weknowmemes.com. 28 Jan. 2012 Web. 4 Feb 2012.
Carroll, Laura Bolin. “Backpacks vs. Briefcases: Steps Toward Rhetorical Analysis.” Writing Spaces: Readings on Writing Volume 1. 2010. Web. 29 Jan. 2012.